We’ve all used Wikipedia. Whether or not it was to settle an argument about who invented the web or to put in writing a last-minute essay at 2 AM. Wikipedia has been the web’s trusty previous library since 2001. However these days, individuals have been saying it’s “too woke,” “too biased,” or “too managed by nameless individuals with an agenda.” Right here comes Elon Musk, who determined the answer wasn’t to repair Wikipedia, however to interchange it.
The brand new child on the block? Grokipedia. A wiki-style encyclopedia powered by Grok, the AI chatbot from Musk’s xAI. The promise? Actual-time updates, AI-driven “artificial corrections,” no ideological gatekeeping, whereas being open supply. The positioning went dwell at grokipedia.enjoyable/en, and naturally, I had to make use of it and see if this factor is the way forward for information or simply one other fever dream.
Tweet from Elon Musk asserting the event of Grokipedia
What Is Grokipedia?
Grokipedia is Musk’s reply to what he calls Wikipedia’s “left-wing bias.” It’s constructed by xAI and makes use of Grok to generate, edit, and refine articles. The thought is that as an alternative of counting on human editors arguing in discuss pages for 14 years about whether or not a tomato is a fruit, Grok will scan the net, detect what’s true, what’s half-true, and what’s complete nonsense, then rewrite the article itself.
Grokipedia’s UI
A few of the huge claims:
AI writes and updates articles in actual time
No ban on sources like Fox Information or the NY Submit
Open-source and free to make use of
Group solutions are allowed, however AI has remaining say
No edit wars, no vandalism, no “censorship”
Sounds wild, proper? However right here’s the factor: none of that’s occurring but.
Easy methods to Entry Grokipedia?
Go to grokipedia.enjoyable/en, and begin utilizing Grokipedia your self.
Okay, so I hit the positioning. First impression? Clear, minimal, and really “early 2000s wiki core.” There aren’t any advertisements, pop-ups, or donation banners (in contrast to Wikipedia). There’s only a homepage with a search bar and a piece outlining the corporate’s sister tasks.
Process 1: Loyality Lies
I typed in “Elon Musk” to check the place its loyalty lies. That is what I get in return:
The web page contained a reference to the search web page of X. Basically, it made a search on X utilizing “Elon Musk” and gave the hyperlink to that web page in return. The hyperlink results in the next web page:
That is the web page you’d get if you seek for one thing on the Discover tab of X.
Opinion: This isn’t useful in any respect. If one is trying to find Elon Musk, they’d like a definitive place to search out details about the particular person. The X search web page outcomes aren’t a type of locations. It is a drawback, as a result of that outcomes web page is a deceptive in itself.
The primary submit that confirmed up is from an individual impersonating (overtly) Elon Musk.
Process 2: Studying Extra on Holocaust
One of many factors underscored by Elon was the flexibility for Grokipedia to provide unbiased info, particularly about delicate subjects. To place this to the take a look at, I attempted studying extra in regards to the Holocaust, a historic occasion with unfavorable connotations. However, so as to add a twist to it, I omitted a letter (u) from the title to see how effectively Grokipedia fares when coping with misnomers.
Once more, I used to be greeted with this one search consequence. Remember the fact that Grokipedia nonetheless hasn’t discovered, or urged that there is perhaps a mistake within the title. Exploring the hyperlink, I got here to the next web page:
Grokipedia didn’t work out the error and supplied outcomes on the unsuitable time period, basically offering ineffective info. To place this into perspective, listed here are the outcomes on Wikipedia for a similar, when carried out from Wikipedia search.
Wikipedia was not solely capable of notice the error within the title but additionally supplied the consequence that the majority would search for.
Opinion: Grokipedia at the moment misses the options that had been obtainable in chatbots or search engines like google years in the past. This could possibly be attributed to the excessive dependence of Grokipedia on the AI chatbot Grok, to maintain the pure language points. However the chatbot as an entire appears to be amiss right here.
Remaining Verdict
One of many core motivations behind Grokipedia was democratizing viewpoints or info. However this needs to be for issues which might be debatable or polarizing. A question like a celeb lookup on-line doesn’t need to be this convoluted. Additionally, Grok wasn’t used at any step of this course of, aside from doing the lookup (perhaps). The data was restricted to only one supply, and that too from X. In its present state, Grokipedia looks like a redirect for the X’s discover tab, fairly than a Wikipedia different.
So What’s there?
Proper now, Grokipedia is principally a wiki-shaped container. It’s a front-end wrapper over the discover performance of X. No different info sources are current. The one dwell factor is the X search integration.
What Went Improper (or Proper)?
Right here’s the twist: this may really be intentional. Based on Musk’s posts on X, Grokipedia continues to be in early beta. The plan is to let Grok ingest huge quantities of knowledge from Wikipedia, tutorial sources, and real-time net content material, then rewrite it with “artificial corrections.” That course of takes time, and it seems to be like they’re nonetheless within the ingestion part.
So yeah, the positioning is dwell, however none of its functionalities are current. I’m nonetheless ready for the AI to maneuver in and begin adorning the data.
Can It Beat Wikipedia?
Wikipedia’s greatest energy isn’t simply its content material—it’s its neighborhood. Thousands and thousands of volunteers, nerds, professors, trolls, and 13-year-olds have spent years constructing that factor. Grokipedia is attempting to interchange all of that with one AI. That’s bananas.
The upside? No edit wars. No vandalism. No “quotation wanted” tags from 2009. The draw back? No transparency. No human oversight. You might be overwhelmed with a plethora of knowledge sources, and it’s important to type your opinion on it your self. You’ll be able to depend on Grok to try this for you, however this has a caveat: Grok has been specifically educated on X posts. So, if the AI thinks a meme is truth, we’d find yourself with articles like “Birds Aren’t Actual: A Scientific Abstract.”
Ought to You Care?
Proper now, Grokipedia is a shell of its future self. It’s not ineffective, however it’s not helpful but. In case you go there anticipating to study one thing, you’ll depart hungry. It’s in no form or type changing Wikipedia anytime quickly. However if you happen to’re inquisitive about what comes subsequent: about whether or not AI can really construct a greater encyclopedia, then yeah, it’s value bookmarking.
Steadily Requested Questions
Q1. What’s Grokipedia? A. Grokipedia is Elon Musk’s AI-powered different to Wikipedia, constructed by xAI and powered by Grok to generate and replace articles in actual time. Q2. Is Grokipedia higher than Wikipedia proper now? A. Not but. It largely redirects to X search outcomes and lacks Wikipedia’s depth, accuracy, and community-driven content material. Q3. Ought to I exploit Grokipedia? A. Provided that you’re curious. It’s nonetheless in early beta and isn’t a sensible substitute for Wikipedia but.
I specialise in reviewing and refining AI-driven analysis, technical documentation, and content material associated to rising AI applied sciences. My expertise spans AI mannequin coaching, information evaluation, and data retrieval, permitting me to craft content material that’s each technically correct and accessible.
Login to proceed studying and revel in expert-curated content material.
Hold Studying for Free
